CO-288 Denial Code β Referral Absent
CO-288 means the payer required a referral for the service billed, but no referral was on file or included with the claim. This is a contractual adjustment β the provider must obtain the referral and resubmit as a corrected claim. It is most common in HMO, POS, and managed Medicaid plans where the primary care provider (PCP) must authorize specialist visits.
Quick Answer
CO-288 means a referral was required but absent. Verify whether a referral was obtained from the PCP, request one retroactively if possible, and resubmit as a corrected claim (frequency type 7) with the referral attached. If the plan does not allow retroactive referrals, appeal with documentation showing the service was medically necessary.
Official Definition
Referral absent.
What This Code Means
CO-288 means the payer required a referral for the service billed, but no referral was on file or included with the claim. This is a contractual adjustment β the provider must obtain the referral and resubmit as a corrected claim. It is most common in HMO, POS, and managed Medicaid plans where the primary care provider (PCP) must authorize specialist visits.
Status
Review AuthorizationRecommended Action
Same standard code Β· different claim context
How CO-288 can be investigated across specialties
CARCs and RARCs are not separate code sets for radiology, gastro, hospital, or professional billing. The code meaning stays standardized; the claim fields, documentation, payer rules, and next checks change by setting.
Professional / Office
Check CMS-1500/837P fields, rendering/billing NPI, diagnosis, modifier, place of service, authorization, and payer policy.
Hospital / Facility
Check UB-04/837I bill type, revenue code, status, inpatient/outpatient rules, authorization, and line-level ERA detail.
Radiology
Check 26/TC component billing, imaging authorization, medical necessity, site of service, same-day edits, and referring provider data.
Gastroenterology
Check procedure relationships, screening vs diagnostic context, modifiers, pathology/anesthesia relationships, authorization, and payer edits.
Behavioral Health
Check provider credential, behavioral-health carve-out, authorization, units/time, telehealth, place of service, and plan-specific rules.
Therapy / Rehab
Check therapy modifiers, timed units, benefit limits, authorization, plan of care/documentation, and NCCI/payer edits.
DME / Supplies
Check HCPCS, modifiers, same/similar equipment, medical necessity, proof of delivery, authorization, and supplier enrollment.
Lab / Pathology
Check CLIA, ordering/referring data, diagnosis support, frequency, panel bundling, specimen/documentation, and payer medical policy.
Financial Impact
Should This Go to Coding?
Do not send every denial to Coding. Coding is appropriate only when the resolution requires coding judgment rather than an administrative or payer follow-up action.
Send to Coding When
Do Not Send to Coding When
Simple rule: If you would have to choose, change, or defend a CPT/HCPCS, ICD-10, modifier, code pair, NCCI edit, or documentation-to-code decision, Coding should review it.
Corrected Claim, Reconsideration, Appeal, or Something Else?
Use the ERA/EOB, RARC, payer portal, policy, claim history, and internal workflow to decide between corrected claim, reconsideration, appeal, coding review, payer follow-up, patient responsibility, or adjustment.
Should I Adjust This Balance?
Treat the balance as recoverable until research shows otherwise. The goal of insurance collections is to resolve the denial and obtain payment when a valid recovery path exists.
Collections rule: A denial code by itself does not automatically mean write-off. Work the claim for payment first when a valid recovery path exists.
What Should My Account Note Say?
4-Part Note Formula
WHAT HAPPENED + WHAT YOU REVIEWED/DID + WHY THAT ACTION WAS CORRECT + WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
General Denial Note
REVIEWED ERA/EOB FOR CO-288. PAYER PROCESSED/DENIED $[AMOUNT] DUE TO [DENIAL REASON + CARC/RARC]. VERIFIED [PORTAL/ELIGIBILITY/CLAIM HISTORY/POLICY/CODING/AUTHORIZATION]. [ACTION TAKEN] BECAUSE [WHY THIS ACTION IS SUPPORTED]. REMAINING BALANCE $[BALANCE]. WILL FOLLOW UP IN [TIMEFRAME] OR NO FURTHER PAYER ACTION REQUIRED.
Adjustment Note
REVIEWED ERA/EOB FOR CO-288. PAYER APPLIED $[AMOUNT] AS [CONTRACTUAL/NONPAYABLE REASON]. VERIFIED FINAL ADJUDICATION, [CONTRACT/POLICY/CODING REVIEW], AND NO ADDITIONAL RECOVERY PATH. ADJUSTED/REQUESTED ADJUSTMENT OF $[AMOUNT] PER ORGANIZATIONAL WORKFLOW. REMAINING BALANCE $[BALANCE]. [FOLLOW-UP OR RESOLVED].
Current decision: DO NOT ADJUST YET. Do not document an action you did not actually perform. Do not say a payment was posted unless you personally posted it.
How to Investigate
Investigation Checklist
Step-by-Step Workflow
Common Causes
Step-by-Step Resolution
Appeal Guidance
Appeal Grounds
The service was medically necessary and a referral was obtained but not properly transmitted, or the plan should allow a retroactive referral given the clinical urgency.
Appeal Letter Template
We are appealing the CO-288 denial for [patient], DOS [date], claim [ID]. The service was medically necessary as documented in the attached records. [A referral was obtained on [date] but not transmitted with the original claim / A retroactive referral has been requested from the PCP]. We respectfully request reconsideration and payment.
Required Documentation Checklist
Prevention Strategies
Real-World Examples
Referral Not Submitted
WonA specialist visit was referred by the PCP but the referral was not attached to the claim. CO-288 returned on an HMO plan.
Obtained the referral from the PCP office, attached it, and resubmitted as a corrected claim (type 7). Paid on next cycle.
Expired Referral
WonThe PCP referral had expired 3 days before the specialist visit. CO-288 returned.
Requested a retroactive referral from the PCP citing clinical necessity. PCP issued a new referral covering the DOS. Resubmitted and paid.
Patient Responsibility
Never bill a patient for a CO-288. The referral requirement is a plan rule, not a patient financial responsibility.
Frequently Asked Questions About CO-288
DenialPro is an educational platform designed to teach medical billing denial management.
Do not submit Protected Health Information (PHI), personally identifiable information (PII), patient names, member IDs, claim numbers, dates of birth, medical record numbers, or confidential healthcare information.
Always verify guidance with official payer policies, CMS guidance, coding guidelines, and applicable regulations.
Need More Help?
Take the next step toward mastering denial management.
Learn in DenialPro Academy
Interactive courses with quizzes, practice labs, real-world scenarios, and certification.
Browse CoursesPractice This Denial
Code lookup is free. Hands on account labs, graded practice, and simulators are premium.
Open Practice CenterGet DenialPro Services
Expert denial management consulting and done-for-you appeal services.
Explore Services